The Effect of High-Normal Preoperative International Normalized Ratios on Outcomes and Complications After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.

Hematoma after anterior cervical spine surgery can result in neurologic and airway compromise. Current guidelines recommend an international normalized ratio (INR) <1.5 before elective spine surgery because of increased complications. The risk associated with an INR of 1.25 is not well studied. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk of complications associated with a preoperative INR >1.25 and ≤1.5 in patients undergoing elective anterior cervical spine surgery. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried. Patients undergoing elective anterior cervical spine surgery from 2012 to 2016 who had an INR recorded within 24 hours of surgery were included. Outcomes of interest included postoperative hematoma requiring surgery, 30-day mortality, and 30-day readmissions and reoperations. A total of 2949 patients were included. The incidence of a postoperative hematoma that required surgical management was 0.2%, 0.6%, and 4.5% in the INR≤1, 11.25 and ≤1.5 before elective anterior cervical spine surgery is associated with significantly higher rates of postoperative hematoma formation as well as 30-day readmission and reoperation; there was a trend toward significance in mortality rate. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(1):e26-e32.].

Proximal humerus fractures: Postoperative protocols and factors affecting treatment decisions among shoulder and elbow and orthopedic trauma surgeons.

Background: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) can lead to functional decline in geriatric and polytraumatized patients. Treatment of PHFs is an area of much debate and much variability between practitioners. Objectives: We surveyed orthopedic trauma (OT) and shoulder and elbow (SE) surgeons to evaluate differences in postoperative protocols when treating acute PHFs with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF), intramedullary nailing (IMN), or hemi or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). Materials and methods: We distributed a web-based survey to three OT and SE associations between August 2018-April 2019. Questions included practice characteristics, standard postoperative protocols for weight-bearing, lifting, and range of motion (ROM) by treatment modality, and factors affecting modality and postoperative protocol decisions. We compared the subspecialties. Results: 239 surgeons [100 (42.2 %) OT, 118 (49.8 %) SE] completed the survey. OT were more likely to allow immediate ROM, lifting, and weight bearing following intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction internal fixation with a locking plate (ORIF), or arthroplasty (all p < 0.025), and to allow earlier unrestricted use of the extremity following IMN and arthroplasty (p = 0.001, p = 0.021 respectively). OT were more likely to consider operating on a PHF if there was contralateral upper extremity injury or need of the injured arm for work or activities of daily living (all p < 0.026). The subspecialties did not differ significantly on factors affecting their postoperative protocols. OT preferred IMN and SE surgeons preferred rTSA for allowing immediate unrestricted postoperative weight bearing, ROM, or lifting (all p < 0.001). Conclusion: There are significant differences in postoperative protocols between trauma and SE surgeons when treating PHFs. Postoperative protocols should be further studied to balance surgical outcomes and the risks of functional decline when treating patients with PHFs.

Effects of Opioid-Limiting Legislation in the State of Ohio on Opioid Prescriptions After Shoulder Arthroscopy.

Background: Recent studies have shown that legislation regulating opioid prescriptions in the United States has been successful in reducing the morphine milligram equivalent (MME) prescribed after certain orthopaedic procedures. Purpose: To (1) determine the effect of Ohio's legislation limiting opioid prescriptions after shoulder arthroscopy and (2) identify risk factors associated with prolonged opioid use and increased postoperative opioid dosing. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We reviewed the data of patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy between January 1, 2016, and March 31, 2020. Patients were classified according to the date of legislation passage (August 31, 2017) as before legislation (PRE) or on/after legislation (POST). Patients were also classified based on the number of opioid prescriptions filled within 30 days of surgery as opioid-tolerant (at least 1 prescription) or opioid-naïve (zero prescriptions). We recorded patient characteristics, medical comorbidities, and surgical details, as well as the number of opioid prescriptions, MME per prescription from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively, and the number of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogues and benzodiazepine prescriptions from 30 days preoperatively to the date of surgery. Differences between cohorts were compared with the Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon test. A covariate-adjusted regression analysis was used to evaluate risk factors associated with increased postoperative opioid dosing. Results: Overall, 279 patients (n = 97 PRE; n = 182 POST; n = 42 opioid-tolerant; n = 237 opioid-naïve) were included in the final analysis. There was a significant reduction in the cumulative MME prescribed in the immediate (0-7 days) postoperative period (PRE, 450 MME vs POST, 315 MME), the first 30 postoperative days (PRE, 590 MME vs POST, 375 MME), and the first 90 postoperative days (PRE, 600 MME vs POST, 420 MME) (P < .001 for all). The opioid-tolerant cohort had higher MME at every time point in the postoperative period (P < .001). Consumption of preoperative opioid (ß = 1682.5; P < .001), benzodiazepine (ß = 468.09; P < .001), and GABA analogue (ß = 251.37; P = .04) was associated with an increase in the cumulative MME prescribed. Conclusion: Opioid prescription-limiting legislation in Ohio significantly reduced the cumulative MME prescribed in the first 30 days postoperatively for both opioid-naïve and opioid-tolerant patients after shoulder arthroscopy. Consumption of opioids, benzodiazepines, and GABA analogues preoperatively was associated with increased postoperative opioid dosage.

Patient Preferences and Perceptions of Provider Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgery in the U.S. historically has been among the least demographically diverse specialties in medicine. Currently, limited data exist on how patients perceive diversity within the field and what patients look for when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon. The purpose of this study was to identify specific patient preferences for surgeon demographics and understand patient perceptions of racial and gender diversity in orthopaedic surgery. METHODS: Nonconsecutive patients from orthopaedic clinics affiliated with a U.S. academic health system voluntarily completed a 39-item questionnaire that surveyed basic demographic information, perception of diversity, racial and gender preferences during surgeon selection, and perception of health-care inequalities. Bivariate analyses were used to test the association between patient-surgeon demographic variables and ratings of diversity. Multiple regression models were used to identify independent predictors of overall perceived diversity ratings. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients (80.6% White, 17.9% Black, and 1.5% other) were analyzed. Black patients were more likely to experience difficulty relating to their surgeon than White patients (11.48% versus 2.29%; odds ratio [OR], 5.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55 to 21.1; p = 0.004). Moreover, Black patients were more likely to perceive racial bias from their surgeon than White patients (5.17% versus 0.37%; OR, 14.44; 95% CI, 1.14 to 766.29; p = 0.02). While the level of racial diversity perceived by White patients (2.57 of 10) was significantly higher than that perceived by Black patients (2.10 of 10) (p = 0.001), the absolute difference between these 2 figures was small, suggesting that both groups perceived racial diversity in orthopaedics to be low. White and Black patients differed in their importance ranking of a surgeon's race (p < 0.0001): Black patients ranked a surgeon's race with higher importance (mean, 3.49 of 10) when selecting a surgeon compared with White patients (1.45 of 10). Both male and female patients gave relatively low importance rankings for a surgeon's gender (mean, 1.58 of 10 and 2.15 of 10, respectively, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in this study did not perceive orthopaedic surgery as a diverse field (overall diversity rating, <3 of 10). There were significant racial and gender differences in patients' preferences for specific physician characteristics when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon, which may help explain some instances of perceived racial bias and difficulty relating to their orthopaedic surgeon.

Effects of Opioid-Limiting Legislation and Increased Provider Awareness on Postoperative Opioid Use and Complications After Hip Arthroscopy.

Background: On August 31, 2017, Ohio passed legislation that regulates how opioids can be prescribed postoperatively. Studies have shown that such legislation is successful in reducing the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed after certain orthopaedic procedures. Purpose: (1) To determine if the opioid prescription-limiting legislation in Ohio reduced the cumulative MMEs prescribed after hip arthroscopy without significantly affecting the rates of emergency department (ED) visits, hospital readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days postoperatively, and (2) to assess risk factors associated with increased postoperative opioid dosing. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This study included patients who underwent primary and revision hip arthroscopy at a single institution over a 4-year period. The prelegislation (PRE) and postlegislation (POST) groups were defined as patients who underwent surgery before August 31, 2017, and on/after this date, respectively. The Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System was queried for controlled-substance prescriptions from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively, and patient medical records were reviewed to collect demographic, medical, surgical, and readmission data. Inverse probability weighting-adjusted mean treatment effect regression models were used to measure the difference in mean outcomes between the PRE and POST cohorts. Results: A total of 546 patients (228 PRE, 318 POST) were identified. There was a 25% reduction in the cumulative MMEs prescribed to the POST group as compared with the PRE group during the first 90 days postoperatively (840 vs 1125 MME, respectively; P < .01). The legislation was associated with a significant decrease in the cumulative MMEs prescribed in the first 90 postoperative days (mean treatment effect = -280.6; P < .01), and there were no significant between-group differences in the frequency of ED encounters (8.8% PRE, 11.6% POST; P = .32), hospital readmissions (1.3% PRE, 0.9% POST; P = .70), or reoperations (0.9% PRE, 0.6% POST; P ≥ .99) during this period. Preoperative opioid use was a significant independent risk factor for increased cumulative MMEs in the first 90 days postoperatively (ß = 275; P < .01). Conclusion: Opioid prescription-limiting legislation in Ohio was associated with significant reductions in opioid MMEs dosing in the 90-day period following hip arthroscopy. This legislation had no significant effect on ED utilization, hospital readmissions, or reoperations within the same period. Preoperative opioid use was a significant risk factor for increased MME dosing after hip arthroscopy.

Clinical and radiographic outcomes following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty utilizing an inset glenoid component at 2-year minimum follow-up: a dual center study.

BACKGROUND: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) is a successful and reproducible treatment for patients with painful glenohumeral arthritis. However, long-term outcomes using traditional onlay glenoid components have been tempered by glenoid loosening. Inset components have been proposed to minimize glenoid loosening by reducing edge-loading and opposite-edge lift-off forces with humeral translation. Successful short- and long-term outcomes have been reported while using inset glenoid implants. The current study is the largest study presenting a minimum of 2-year follow-up data following aTSA with an all-polyethylene inset glenoid component (Shoulder Innovations, Holland, MI, USA). METHODS: A dual center, retrospective review of patients undergoing aTSA using an Inset glenoid component by 2 fellowship-trained shoulder surgeons at 2 separate institutions from August, 2016, to August, 2019, was performed. Minimum follow-up was 2 years. Range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were obtained. Radiographic outcomes, including central peg lucency and glenoid loosening, were assessed by 3 independent reviewers on the postoperative Grashey and axillary radiographs obtained at the final follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-five shoulders were included for the final analysis. The mean age of the entire cohort was 64 (±11.4) years. Twenty-one (28%) glenoids were type A1, 10 (13.3%) were type A2, 13 (17.3%) were type B1, 22 (29.3%) were type B2, 6 (8%) were type B3, and 3 (4%) were type D. At a minimum follow-up of 24 months (mean: 28.7 months), a significant improvement in ROM in all planes was observed. Significant improvements in VAS (5.1-0.9, P < .001), SANE (39.5-91.2, P < .001), and ASES (43.7-86.6, P < .001) scores were observed. There were 4 (5.3%) cases of central peg lucency about the inset glenoid component and one (1.3%) case of glenoid loosening. No revisions were performed for glenoid loosening. CONCLUSION: At a minimum of 2 years postoperatively, there were significant improvements in ROM, VAS, SANE, and ASES scores with very low rates of central peg lucency and glenoid loosening in patients undergoing aTSA with an inset glenoid component. Further work is needed to determine the long-term benefit of this novel implant.

Patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty prefer greater surgeon involvement in shared decision making.

BACKGROUND: There has been a shift in medical decision making from a paternalist model to a shared decision-making (SDM) approach, described as a patient-physician relationship where both parties collaborate to arrive on an evidence-based treatment regimen that best suits the patient's needs and values. However, there is a scarcity in evidence regarding SDM in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate overall patient preference for SDM and determine demographic and socioeconomic factors related to SDM preference in those undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS: Patients aged 40-89 years who had undergone a total shoulder arthroplasty were enrolled. Two-part questionnaires were administered collecting patient demographic information and SDM subscale scores postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariate regression models were used to determine factors associated with SDM Total and subscale scores. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients (53 male; mean age, 69.5 ± 10.4 years) who had undergone primary total shoulder arthroplasty were included. The mean Total SDM score was -2.24 ± 1.9 and the Preoperative, Operative, and Postoperative SDM subscale scores were -1.54 ± 2.0, -2.59 ± 2.2, and -2.48 ± 2.1, respectively, indicating a preference for SDM in the Preoperative subscale and surgeon-driven decision making in the total score and other 2 subscales. Multivariate regression models demonstrated a preference for surgeon decision making at both the 4-12-week postoperative period for the Preoperative subscale (odds ratio [OR] -1.03, 95% CI -2.0, -0.1, P = .039) and the 2-4-week postoperative period for the Operative subscale (OR -1.74, 95% CI -3.4, -0.1, P = .038) when compared to patients at the 2-week postoperative period. No other variables were significantly associated with any of the SDM subscale scores or Total SDM score. CONCLUSION: Patients reported a more passive role in the decision-making process with an overall preference for a surgeon-led approach in primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients preferred a shared decision-making approach in regard to preoperative considerations but indicated a significant preference for surgeon-led decision making regarding day of surgery decisions. There were no correlations between SDM scores and age, sex, race, income, education level, insurance type, or treating surgeon. Overall, patients demonstrated a predilection for an SDM approach for preoperative considerations, contrary to those decisions associated with the day of surgery and postoperative care.

Oral Ketorolac as an Adjuvant Agent for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

INTRODUCTION: Successful outpatient anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction hinges on effective analgesia. Routinely, oral narcotic agents have been the preferred analgesic postoperatively in orthopaedic surgery. However, these agents have several known adverse effects and are associated with a potential for abuse. This study evaluates the efficacy of ketorolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug with analgesic properties, as an adjuvant agent for postoperative pain control after ACL reconstruction. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction were prospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria involved patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, renal dysfunction, chronic analgesia use, or alcohol abuse. Eligible patients were randomized into one of two groups. The control group received a standard-of-care pain protocol involving oxycodone-acetaminophen 5 to 325 on discharge. The ketorolac group additionally received intravenous ketorolac postoperatively and 3 days of oral ketorolac on discharge. Pain levels and total narcotic utilization were recorded three times per day for the first 5 days after surgery. Pain and functional outcomes were obtained at 2 and 6 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: The final analysis included 48 patients; the mean age of the cohort was 32 ± 11.6 years, and 60.4% of patients were female. No differences were observed in preoperative demographics, comorbidities, and preoperative functional scores between the two groups. Over the first 5 days after surgery, patients in the ketorolac group consumed a mean of 45.4% fewer narcotic pills than the control group (P < 0.001). In addition, mean postoperative pain scores were 22.36 points lower for patients in the ketorolac group (P < 0.001). There was no difference in functional outcome scores at up to 6 weeks postoperatively or adverse events between the two groups with no reported cases of gastrointestinal bleeding. DISCUSSION: The use of adjunctive intravenous and short-term oral ketorolac substantially reduces narcotic utilization and pain levels after ACL reconstruction. CLINICALTRIALGOV REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04246554.

Use of Anatomic Radiographic Horizons for the Lateral Center-Edge Angle in the Classification of Hip Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: The lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg (LCEA) and Tönnis angle (TA) rely on a "horizon" that functions as a reference point for measurements of hip dysplasia on weightbearing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs. There are 3 different horizons that are currently utilized depending on surgeon preference: (1) a line parallel to the radiographic floor (F), (2) a line that connects the inferior portions of the acetabular teardrops (ATs), or (3) a line that connects the ischial tuberosities (ITs). It is imperative to accurately assess the degree of hip dysplasia on initial workup to select the appropriate surgical intervention. PURPOSE: To assess how the choice of a radiographic horizon affects the measurements of the LCEA and TA. The secondary purpose was to assess how the horizon affected the classification of hips as either normal, borderline dysplastic, or dysplastic. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The LCEA and TA were measured on all preoperative weightbearing anteroposterior pelvis radiographs for 186 consecutive patients who underwent hip preservation surgery between February 2016 and November 2020 (140 hip arthroscopic procedures, 46 combined hip arthroscopic procedures with periacetabular osteotomy), 3 times per hip, each time using an F, AT, and IT horizon. The Student t test was used to analyze the differences in the measurements of the LCEA and TA, and discordance rates in the dysplasia classification between horizons were quantified. RESULTS: For the entire study population, the mean LCEAF (23.4°± 7.4°) was significantly greater than the mean LCEAIT (23.1°± 7.2°) (95% CI, -0.634 to -0.003; P = .047) and mean LCEAAT (23.0°± 7.1°) (95% CI, -0.723 to -0.139; P = .004). There was no difference between the LCEAIT and LCEAAT (95% CI, -0.305 to 0.080; P = .251). When stratified by hip arthroscopic surgery, the mean LCEAF (26.3°± 5.6°) was significantly greater than the mean LCEAAT (25.8°± 5.3°) (95% CI, -0.845 to -0.162; P = .004). Overall, there was a 17.7% and 18.3% discordance rate in the dysplasia classification using the LCEAIT and LCEAAT compared with the LCEAF, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the mean TAIT, TAAT, and TAF for the entire study population, the arthroscopic surgery group, and the combined arthroscopic surgery and periacetabular osteotomy group. CONCLUSION: There was no statistical difference between the AT and IT horizons for LCEA measurements. The dysplasia classification was in better agreement between the 2 anatomic horizons compared with the F horizon. The TA was not affected by changes in the horizon.

Surgical Technique of the "Up-The-Neck" View During Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

In the setting of femoroacetabular impingement, arthroscopy versus open surgery confers many advantages. However, inadequate bony resection remains a concern and is the leading cause of revision surgery. Several strategies have been described to ensure a more-complete resection during hip arthroscopy. In this current technique article, the authors describe a modified anterior portal site view called the "up-the-neck" view. This view allows for greater visualization of the femoral head-neck junction and alleviates challenges faced when assessing resection intraoperatively. The "up-the-neck" view is achieved by placing a 70° arthroscope in the anterior lateral portal and subsequently rotating the camera 90°. The head-neck junction will appear horizontally, rather than vertically, on this view, which allows for the easy identification of missed imperfections. This may reduce the need for revision surgery and future investigation is necessary to determine the reoperation rates following this technique.

The Use of Tumor Prostheses for Primary or Revision Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Proximal Humeral Bone Loss.

Background: During shoulder arthroplasty with substantial bone and soft tissue loss, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with a tumor prosthesis may restore function, reduce pain, and improve implant fixation. Methods: Thirteen adult patients undergoing RSA using a tumor prosthesis system were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative visual analog score (VAS), single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, simple shoulder test (SST), and forward flexion were compared to latest follow up. Postoperative radiographs and complications were recorded. Results: Mean age at surgery was 68.4 years. Eight patients had undergone at least 1 prior operation on the indicated shoulder. Six patients required wide excision of proximal humerus tumor. At mean of 34 months postoperatively, significant improvements were noted in VAS (P = .03) and ASES score (P = .04). Active forward elevation was 81.1 degrees. For all patients, postoperative radiographs demonstrated satisfactory alignment. Complications occurred in 38% of patients, with 31% requiring reoperation. Conclusion: In cases of failed shoulder arthroplasty with excessive bone and soft tissue loss or substantial tumor burden, RSA with a tumor prosthesis can reduce pain levels and improve functional outcomes. However, forward elevation remains limited, and postoperative complications are a concern.

Validation of the Artificial Floor Technique in First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Patient function after arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) relies on proper positioning of the first MTPJ. To maximize the likelihood of good postoperative function, the dorsiflexion angle, referred to as the fusion sagittal angle, should range between 20° and 30°, corresponding to 10° to 15° of dorsiflexion off the weightbearing axis. However, achieving appropriate sagittal alignment intraoperatively is challenging. The artificial floor technique (AFT) uses a rigid, flat surface to simulate the weightbearing position of the foot intraoperatively to accurately position the first MTPJ without fluoroscopy. This technique has been previously described and is commonly used but, to our knowledge, it has never been validated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is the AFT a valid and repeatable technique for positioning the fusion sagittal angle between 20° and 30° of dorsiflexion from the first metatarsal? (2) Does the fusion sagittal angle obtained using the AFT vary with foot size? METHODS: In this retrospective study, a search was performed using Current Procedural Terminology codes for patients undergoing first MTPJ arthrodesis by one surgeon between June 2012 and June 2020. The surgical technique used during this time did not vary and consisted of the use of a rigid, flat, sterile surface. The entire foot was placed flat on the surface, simulating the weightbearing position and allowing for an evaluation of the fusion sagittal angle of the first MTPJ. The target sagittal alignment was achieved when the soft tissue of the plantar surface at the distal-most aspect of the proximal phalanx was measured (using a sterile ruler) as 1 cm off the artificial floor. The recommended fusion sagittal angle falls within a range of 20° to 30°, which allows for 1-mm to 2-mm variations in measuring the elevation of the proximal phalanx off the artificial floor. Fixation was achieved with two 2.8-mm threaded, double-pointed Steinmann pins placed through the intramedullary canal of the proximal and distal phalanges and into the first metatarsal. Once fixation was achieved, the fusion sagittal angle was confirmed with the AFT without using fluoroscopy. Postoperatively, patients were allowed to bear weight fully on their heels in a postoperative, rigid-soled shoe. During the study period, 117 patients (135 feet) underwent first MTPJ arthrodesis utilizing the AFT for either first MTPJ arthritis/hallux rigidus, hallux valgus, or inflammatory arthropathy. Of those, we considered patients with preoperative AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs and patients with AP and lateral weightbearing radiographs at 3 months postoperatively after the removal of the internal fixation construct as eligible for analysis. Based on these criteria, 84% (113 of 135) of feet were included in the final radiographic analysis. Sixteen percent (22 of 135) of the feet were excluded because postoperative radiographs demonstrating the removal of the internal fixation construct were absent from the Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) in these cases. The length of the whole foot, first metatarsal, and proximal phalanx were measured on preoperative weightbearing radiographs. In addition, fusion sagittal angles were measured on weightbearing radiographs after removal of internal fixation construct at a minimum of 3 months postoperatively (mean 3.5 ± 2.2 months). No patients were lost to follow-up before obtaining those radiographs. Two qualified reviewers independently evaluated each radiograph. We ascertained inter- and intraobserver reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). We determined whether the fusion sagittal angle obtained using the AFT varied with foot size by using a multiple linear regression model. RESULTS: In the entire study group, the mean fusion sagittal angle using the AFT was 27° ± 4°. The interobserver ICC of the fusion sagittal angle measurements was 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 to 0.97; p < 0.001). The intraobserver ICC for reviewer 1 was 0.95 (95% CI 0.92 to 0.97; p < 0.001) and the intraobserver ICC for reviewer 2 was 0.97 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.98; p < 0.001). Ninety-one percent (103 of 113) of the study group fell within the acceptable range of 20° to 30° ± 2°. The multiple linear regression analyses demonstrated that the preoperative lengths of the whole foot (ß =-0.05 [95% CI -0.12 to 0.02]; p = 0.16), proximal phalanx (ß =-0.13 [95% CI -0.46 to 0.20]; p = 0.44), and first metatarsal (ß = 0.13 [95% CI -0.10 to 0.35]; p = 0.27) were not independently associated with the postoperative fusion sagittal angle. CONCLUSION: The AFT allows for accurate and reproducible positioning of the first MTPJ within the appropriate functional range of dorsiflexion, regardless of foot size. Additionally, this technique can be performed without fluoroscopy and so avoids radiation exposure to the patient and the surgical team. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Restoration of the native humeral anatomy during stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a radiographic comparison of intramedullary versus freehand resection.

BACKGROUND: During anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA), the humeral head can be resected with or without the use of an intramedullary cutting guide, the former referred to as intramedullary (IM) resection and the latter referred to as freehand (FH) resection. Outcomes following aTSA are predicated upon the restoration of the native humeral anatomy, which can be more challenging with stemless implants. To date, no studies have determined which method of humeral head resection is superior in restoring native anatomy. Our purpose was to determine whether FH or IM resection was superior in restoring native anatomy during aTSA with stemless implants. METHODS: A review of all patients who underwent aTSA using the stemless Tornier Simpliciti Shoulder System at two academic institutions by two separate surgeons between January 2017 and June 2020 was performed. One surgeon at one institution performed stemless aTSA using the IM resection technique, while the second surgeon utilized the FH resection technique. Patients were excluded if they underwent surgery for an indication other than glenohumeral osteoarthritis, if they received a short-stem or standard-stem implant, or if they lacked adequate preoperative and postoperative Grashey radiographs. One hundred eleven patients across both institutions (51 IM, 60 FH) were included for the final radiographic assessment. The humeral head height (HH) and neck-shaft angle (NSA) were measured on preoperative and postoperative Grashey radiographs. The centers of rotation (CORs) were measured on postoperative Grashey radiographs. Patients were classified as having acceptable restoration of their native anatomy if the change (Δ) in COR or HH was ≤3 mm and ≤ 5 mm, respectively, or if the postoperative NSA was ≥130°. RESULTS: IM resection had the greatest acceptable restoration of COR (90.2% IM versus 70% FH, P = .009), HH (96.1% IM vs. 63.3% FH, P < .001), and NSA (96.1% IM vs. 78.3% FH, P = .006) relative to FH resection. The mean postoperative NSAs for the IM and FH cohorts were 134.4° (±2.1°) and 133.8° (±5.4°), respectively (P = .208). The mean ΔCORs for the IM and FH groups were 1.2 (±1.5) and 2.3 (±1.2) mm, respectively (P < .001). Finally, the mean ΔHHs for the IM and FH cohorts were 1.7 (±1.4) and 4.4 (±2.9) mm, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Restoration of the native humeral anatomy following stemless aTSA occurred at a significantly higher rate when using IM vs. FH resection.

Survivorship, complications, and outcomes following distal femoral arthroplasty for non-neoplastic indications.

AIMS: Endoprosthetic reconstruction with a distal femoral arthroplasty (DFA) can be used to treat distal femoral bone loss from oncological and non-oncological causes. This study reports the short-term implant survivorship, complications, and risk factors for patients who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 75 patients from a single institution who underwent DFA for non-neoplastic indications, including aseptic loosening or mechanical failure of a previous prosthesis (n = 25), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (n = 23), and native or periprosthetic distal femur fracture or nonunion (n = 27). Patients with less than 24 months' follow-up were excluded. We collected patient demographic data, complications, and reoperations. Reoperation for implant failure was used to calculate implant survivorship. RESULTS: Overall one- and five-year implant survivorship was 87% and 76%, respectively. By indication for DFA, mechanical failure had one- and five-year implant survivorship of 92% and 68%, PJI of 91% and 72%, and distal femur fracture/nonunion of 78% and 70% (p = 0.618). A total of 37 patients (49%) experienced complications and 27 patients (36%) required one or more reoperation. PJI (n = 16, 21%), aseptic loosening (n = 9, 12%), and wound complications (n = 8, 11%) were the most common complications. Component revision (n = 10, 13.3%) and single-stage exchange for PJI (n = 9, 12.0 %) were the most common reoperations. Only younger age was significantly associated with increased complications (mean 67 years (SD 9.1)) with complication vs 71 years (SD 9.9) without complication; p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: DFA is a viable option for distal femoral bone loss from a range of non-oncological causes, demonstrating acceptable short-term survivorship but with high overall complication rates. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(3):173-181.

Effects of opioid-limiting legislation on postoperative opioid use in shoulder arthroplasty in an epidemic epicenter.

BACKGROUND: The current opioid epidemic in the United States has become a public health crisis with an estimated 150 daily deaths and nearly 47,000 opioid-related deaths in the United States in 2017 alone. Sensible prescriber practice changes have been a focus of policymakers to decrease the total number of narcotic pain medications in circulation. In the state of Ohio, opioid prescription limits for acute pain were enacted in August 2017. However, given the association of acute opioid exposure with long-term use and lack of assessment of these policies, there is an unmet need to evaluate the effects of similar legislation in Ohio on postoperative opioid dosing after shoulder arthroplasty. This study evaluates the effects of opioid prescription-limiting legislation in Ohio on postoperative opioid dosing in shoulder arthroplasty and assesses risk factors related to long-term opioid use. METHODS: All patients undergoing primary and revision shoulder arthroplasty over a 5-year period performed by a single surgeon were included. The pre-legislation (PRE) and post-legislation (POST) groups were defined as patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty before August 31, 2017 and on or after August 31, 2017, respectively. The Ohio Automated Rx Reporting System was queried for controlled-substance prescriptions from 30 days preoperatively to 90 days postoperatively. Patients were designated as opioid tolerant if they had filled an opioid prescription within 30 days of surgery. A binary logistic regression analysis was applied to assess factors related to long-term opioid use. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: PRE (n = 99) and POST (n = 235). Accounting for legislative effects, we observed significant reductions in cumulative morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dosing in the opioid-naive patients in the 7-day and 30-day postoperative periods (450.0 MMEs in PRE group vs. 210.0 MMEs in POST group, P < .001) and in the opioid-tolerant patients in the 7-day postoperative period (450.0 MMEs in PRE group vs. 250.0 MMEs in POST group, P = .001). Among the opioid-naive patients, the POST group had a significant MME reduction in the 90-day postoperative period relative to the PRE cohort (P < .001). Preoperative opioid tolerance and benzodiazepine tolerance were independent risk factors for increased MME dosing at 90 days postoperatively (P < .001 and P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSION: Opioid prescription-limiting legislation for acute pain in the state of Ohio is associated with a notable reduction in opioid MME dosing in the 90-day postoperative period after shoulder arthroplasty, particularly in opioid-naive patients in the first 30 days postoperatively. Preoperative opioid tolerance is correlated with significantly higher MME dosing postoperatively after shoulder arthroplasty.

Worse Outcomes Are Associated With Proximal Femoral Replacement Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral replacements (PFRs) are often used in the setting of severe bone loss. As osteolysis has become less common, PFR may be used to address other causes of bone loss such as infection or periprosthetic fracture. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of PFR for non-neoplastic conditions. METHODS: A retrospective review of 46 patients undergoing PFR at a single institution was performed. The electronic records were reviewed to extract relevant information including the reason for use of PFR, surgical variables, follow-up, and complications. Survivorship curves were generated and differences in survivorship were evaluated using the log-rank test. Radiographic evaluation was also performed. RESULTS: Using revision as an endpoint, the Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort demonstrated a survival rate of 74% at 1 year and 67% at 5 years. Patients with a preoperative diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection demonstrated the lowest survivorship with a failure rate of 47%. Furthermore, a high dislocation rate at 17.4% (n = 8) was observed. The use of dual-mobility articulation was effective in reducing dislocation. CONCLUSION: PFR is a valuable reconstructive option for patients with massive proximal femoral bone loss. This study demonstrates that patients with periprosthetic joint infection who undergo PFR reconstruction are at very high risk of subsequent failure, most commonly from reinfection and instability. The use of a dual-mobility articulation in association with PFR appears to help mitigate risk of subsequent dislocation.

Protocol for a multicenter, randomised controlled trial of surgeon-directed home therapy vs. outpatient rehabilitation by physical therapists for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the SHORT trial.

BACKGROUND: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has emerged as a successful surgery with expanding indications. Outcomes may be influenced by post-operative rehabilitation; however, there is a dearth of research regarding optimal rehabilitation strategy following RTSA. The primary purpose of this study is to compare patient reported and clinical outcomes after RTSA in two groups: in one group rehabilitation is directed by formal, outpatient clinic-based physical therapists (PT group) as compared to a home therapy group, in which patients are instructed in their rehabilitative exercises by surgeons at post-operative appointments (HT group). Secondary aims include comparisons of complications, cost of care and quality of life between the two groups. METHODS: This randomised controlled trial has commenced at seven sites across the United States. Data is being collected on 200 subjects by clinical research assistants pre-operatively and post-operatively at 2, 6, and 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 and 2 year visits. The following variables are being assessed: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), pain level using the numeric pain scale, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and shoulder active and passive range of motion for analysis of the primary aim. Chi square and t-tests will be used to measure differences in baseline characteristics of both groups. Repeated measures linear mixed effects modeling for measurement of differences will be used for outcomes associated with ASES and SANE and scores, and range of motion measures. Secondary aims will be analyzed for comparison of complications, cost, and quality of life assessment scores using data obtained from the PROMIS 29 v. 2, questionnaires administered at standard of care post-operative visits, and the electronic health record. Subjects will be allowed to crossover between the PT and HT groups, and analysis will include both intention-to-treat including patients who crossed over, and a second with cross-over patients removed, truncated to the time they crossed over. DISCUSSION: RTSA is being performed with increasing frequency, and the optimal rehabilitation strategy is unclear. This study will help clarify the role of formal physical therapy with particular consideration to outcomes, cost, and complications. In addition, this study will evaluate a proposed rehabilitation strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered as NCT03719859 at ClincialTrials.gov .

The Fate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Following Megaprosthesis Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: A megaprosthesis may be used for reconstruction in patients with massive bone loss or a periprosthetic fracture. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) may occur after a megaprosthesis reconstruction and may pose a major challenge. The outcomes of managing PJI in patients with a megaprosthesis is relatively unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical course and outcomes of PJI in patients with a megaprosthesis in place. METHODS: From a total of 219 patients who underwent megaprosthesis replacement for non-oncologic conditions, 38 (17.4%) developed subsequent PJI. A retrospective review of the medical record was performed to ascertain the course of the PJI and treatment outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate the survival function, and the log-rank test was used to assess differences in outcome measures. RESULTS: The surgical management of 33 patients with PJI included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) (82%), consisting of DAIR with modular component exchange (19 patients) and DAIR without component exchange (8 patients); 2-stage exchange arthroplasty (9%); resection arthroplasty (6%); and a single-stage revision arthroplasty (3%). The Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis demonstrated that the overall survival rate was 65.1% at 2 years. The mortality rate was 15%, with many patients undergoing salvage procedures including amputation (18%), arthrodesis (6%), and resection arthroplasty (6%). CONCLUSIONS: The rate of PJI after megaprosthesis reconstruction, 17% in this study, appears to be very high. The management of PJI in these patients is challenging, with 1 of 3 patients undergoing failed treatment. Despite the limited options available, DAIR seems to be an appropriate treatment strategy for some of these patients. Further data on a larger cohort are needed to assess the success of various surgical procedures and predictors of failure in this challenging patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Milvexian for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism.

BACKGROUND: Factor XIa inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thromboembolism may be more effective and result in less bleeding than conventional anticoagulants. Additional data are needed regarding the efficacy and safety of milvexian, an oral factor XIa inhibitor. METHODS: In this parallel-group, phase 2 trial, we randomly assigned 1242 patients undergoing knee arthroplasty to receive one of seven postoperative regimens of milvexian (25 mg, 50 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg twice daily or 25 mg, 50 mg, or 200 mg once daily) or enoxaparin (40 mg once daily). The primary efficacy outcome was venous thromboembolism (which was a composite of asymptomatic deep-vein thrombosis, confirmed symptomatic venous thromboembolism, or death from any cause). The principal safety outcome was bleeding. RESULTS: Among the patients receiving milvexian twice daily, venous thromboembolism developed in 27 of 129 (21%) taking 25 mg, in 14 of 124 (11%) taking 50 mg, in 12 of 134 (9%) taking 100 mg, and in 10 of 131 (8%) taking 200 mg. Among those receiving milvexian once daily, venous thromboembolism developed in 7 of 28 (25%) taking 25 mg, in 30 of 127 (24%) taking 50 mg, and in 8 of 123 (7%) taking 200 mg, as compared with 54 of 252 patients (21%) taking enoxaparin. The dose-response relationship with twice-daily milvexian was significant (one-sided P<0.001), and the 12% incidence of venous thromboembolism with twice-daily milvexian was significantly lower than the prespecified benchmark of 30% (one-sided P<0.001). Bleeding of any severity occurred in 38 of 923 patients (4%) taking milvexian and in 12 of 296 patients (4%) taking enoxaparin; major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding occurred in 1% and 2%, respectively; and serious adverse events were reported in 2% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative factor XIa inhibition with oral milvexian in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty was effective for the prevention of venous thromboembolism and was associated with a low risk of bleeding. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and Janssen Research and Development; AXIOMATIC-TKR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03891524.).